Effect of phonological processing on temporal processing
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Effects of Emotional Content on Phonological Processing in Children Who Stutter
Objectives: Stuttering and phonological processing are mutually related. Emotion is an effective factor in fluency and language processing; however, its underlying neural mechanism remains unclear. Event-Related Potential (ERP) is a non-invasive highly-beneficial method with high time resolution for language processing. The present study aimed to explore phonological processing in emotional wor...
متن کاملCross-modality temporal processing deficits in developmental phonological dyslexics.
Neuroanatomical evidence suggests that poor readers may have abnormal lateral (LGN) and medial (MGN) geniculate nuclei responsible for temporal processing in visual and auditory domains respectively (Livingstone & Galaburda, 1993). Although behavioral evidence does support this neuroanatomical evidence in that poor readers have performed poorly on visual and auditory tasks thought to require th...
متن کاملCorrelations between reading, phonological awareness and auditory temporal processing.
BACKGROUND Auditory temporal processing and reading. AIM To analyse the potential correlations between reading acquisition, phonological awareness, and auditory temporal processing in Brazilian children with dyslexia. METHOD This study evaluated sixty children, nine to twelve years of age, divided into two groups: a control group of twenty seven children without dyslexia and a study group o...
متن کاملDyslexia, phonological processing in
Two main proximal causes have been considered. Historically, the initial hypothesis was that of a visual deficit (“congenital word blindness”, coined by William Pringle-Morgan in 1896). In the 1970s, it became evident that what had been interpreted as visual letter confusions were better explained by phonological confusions. Over the last three decades it has been well established that most cas...
متن کاملDyslexia, phonological processing in
Two main proximal causes have been considered. Historically, the initial hypothesis was that of a visual deficit (“congenital word blindness”, coined by William Pringle-Morgan in 1896). In the 1970s, it became evident that what had been interpreted as visual letter confusions were better explained by phonological confusions. Over the last three decades it has been well established that most cas...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Japanese Psychological Research
سال: 2000
ISSN: 0021-5368,1468-5884
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5884.00143